Science And Faith (or Something Along Those Lines)

Comp ar and Contrast : Science and religious beliefBoth apprehension and assent be motivated by the quest to find univocal lawfulness , so both the scientist and the devout are characterized by authority of chouseledge . The difference lies in the fact that the scientist is prone to hauteur , believing that he has final proof of what he avows to . On the other legislate , the devout , when shift of dogma , is reactive that that belief is involved , and that it is not possible for man to ` get along . The devout is therefore modest , as opposed to the scientist br who is arrogant . This is however only a rule of dactyl . The scientist may be modest if he is conscious that completely knowledge is mere belief . On the other advance the devout may be arrogant if his doctrine takes the sketch of dogmaAbsolute truth is the goal of both science and faith . The scientific method is designed as to eliminate all errors is apprisal , so that knowledge derived from the observed object can be claimed as certain The scientist relies on precision of measurement and numerical s towards his goal of exactitude . Faith also seeks living knowledge , for it is knowledge of the Supreme Being which is sought through religion . Such knowledge is without error , and so same to what the scientist seeksBoth science and faith use semblance to express what they convey to say Science uses numeral models to express its findings , and a mathematical model is in truth an similarity . A area of force is a mathematical model , so when science describes something as spherical it is using analogy . This is the trivial role . In fully developed scientific theories more expound models are used . For example Rutherford describes the atom as a plaything solar system , where the electrons orbit around the heart of protons and neutrons . Faith uses analog! y in a more verbatim and self-explanatory way .

For example Christians describe deity as the take , and this is employing explicit analogyThe scientist , however , is not continuously aware that he is employing analogy , and therefore mistakes his assertions for absolute truths . Even though he acknowledges experimental error , he believes that it is creation scale by the gradual progress of science , so that the errors in scientific pronouncements are becoming more and more unnoticeable by the day . If not the final truth , the scientist believes that he is feeler it , so that he becomes oblivious of the fact that analogy is existe nce employed . On the other hand faith , when it is free of dogma , is quite conscious of the fact that analogy is being used . It is aware because it knows the ways of God provide always remain a whodunit to man , so that it is not possible to make absolute pronouncements on God , to any(prenominal) degree of precisionThe scientist is prone to believe that there is no mystery story to existence and that native ignorance is all that holds back the human being from apprehending the universe with complete certainty . He tends to believe that modern...If you phone for to get a full essay, order it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper